Home
About
Us
Action!
Service
Dogs
In The Life
Available
What
Does ROM Mean?
Influence
Dogs
Bitches
In
The Ring
Popularity
Articles
Future
Stars
Other
Breeds
Inspiration
Other's Achievements
Health
Contact
Us
Jon's Perspectives
Jon on Politics
|
Addressing AKC Financial Challenges
by Jonathan Jeffrey Kimes
There is no question that the dog fancy under the American Kennel Club
umbrella is facing financial concerns. For decades, the AKC was
able to meet its fiscal needs through its ever growing registrations –
registrations which were generously made up of puppies sold
commercially through catalogs and pet stores. Over time, the
American Kennel Club, in an effort to retain a position of integrity in
its registration system, began to require such things such as DNA
profiles on frequently used breeding dogs. The commercial
breeders – the puppy mills – resented the burdensome oversight the AKC
cast upon its customers and so the commercial breeders retaliated by
developing their own registration systems. As a result AKC
registrations began to fall and it became very clear that the revenues
generated by the registration of these milled puppies were an important
cash stream.
We in the fancy were able to pretend we didn’t know of the criticality
of this revenue stream and we viewed these commercial breeders as very
undesirable concerns which deserved our disdain. We have always
understood that puppies sold through pet stores often end up in
unsuitable homes living miserable lives, that certainly a percentage of
them end up in shelters as their owners come to realize they are
ill-equipped to successfully raise whatever breed they chose when they
walked into a pet store. As concerned and committed breeders we
understand that buying a puppy cannot and should not be an impulse
decision and that new owners often require the help and support that
only a private breeder can provide. We also understand that if
the new puppy doesn’t fit into the household we will reclaim that
not-so-cute adolescent or semi-untrained adult and apply our skill and
knowledge to rehabilitate it and shelter it until a new, suitable home
is found. We don’t have the failure rate that pet stores have
because we don’t sell our puppies to just anyone who comes knocking on
our door. And we keep our puppies until suitable homes are
found. Our very commitment to the welfare of our dogs guarantees
we are not a profit center. We are responsible citizens of
society and do not shift our burden off to shelters or breed clubs who
use member resources to shoulder the failures of others.
Many of us rejoiced when the puppy millers left and hoped that the
labeling of “AKC Registered” would actually mean something substantive
in the future beyond just paperwork processing.
However, the “business” people at AKC have different ideas.
Without question, it is understood the financial structure of the AKC
is not simply a direct relationship of registration processing so that
when registration revenues go down, the cost of supporting the
American Kennel Club structure does not contract accordingly. I
don’t think anyone is lost on this situation. What I do believe
what is at contention is this notion that the only way to solve the
financial problem is to encourage puppy millers. I
have a strong moral conviction for the health and welfare of all dogs
and I am certainly neither willing nor able to passively sit by while
the AKC pleads its case that partnering with puppy millers is in all
our
best interests.
We must reconcile our moral and ethical stance with puppy
milling. The politics around this are astounding. I
recently read a manifesto which stated it was the “Animal Rightists”
who turned ethical breeders away from puppy millers – and I am
pointedly not going to use the euphemism “high volume breeder” which is
tantamount to putting lipstick on a pig. We must not forget the
American Kennel Club is a congress of dog clubs. I do not believe
there is a single club amongst its ranks who allow its members to breed
or sell dogs commercially. These member clubs require its
membership to attest to a Code of Ethics which wholly and completely
focuses on the breeding of dogs for the pursuit of breed improvement
and they set standards by which breeders maintain their dogs, how often
they breed their dogs, and how those resultant puppies are placed in
homes. Not a single club permits its members to view dog breeding
as a commercial venture. Yet we allow the American Kennel Club to
take this schizophrenic stance and not only permit commercial dog
breeding, but we are being courted to encourage it. We are being
told to look the other way because our “sport” cannot survive if we are
not willing to sacrifice the quality of life of thousands of
unfortunate dogs. This stance is absolutely sickening to
me. I stare in amazement as I read enthusiastic endorsements of
this disgusting point of view.
If you have no “trouble” with the concept of commercial breeders then
perhaps you need some factual information to help you process it.
It is the USDA which regulates commercial dog breeding in the United
States and it sets “minimum” standards for the housing of these
dogs. In order to meet its requirements, it states that a dog
which measures 11 inches long (from nose to tail) has to be kept in
a kennel space which is no smaller than 2 feet by 2 feet. Do you
realize the USDA considers this kennel space to be sufficient so that
this dog, in fact, is legally permitted to live the entirety of its
life in a space 2 feet by 2 feet? Do you understand that there is
no requirement that such a dog EVER be walked or let outside of this
cage? For a large dog of 54 inches in length the USDA
considers it sufficient that such a dog live in perpetuity in a space
which measures 7 feet by 7 feet. This dog can legally be
confined for life in this space. If the miller has an “exercise
plan” (which is unspecific by regulation) then dogs can actually be
kept in smaller spaces. No one, including the AKC, can legally
require a dog to be kept in a space any larger than the minimum defined
space. Perhaps you should also know the largest distributor
of puppies in the United States has over 85,000 puppies which pass
through its facilities annually. Perhaps you might also
wish to know the USDA requires that not more than 1,000 pounds of
animal carcass can be buried in a space of less than 1 acre and it has
been reported distributors sometimes manage the carcasses of dead dogs
and puppies by installing an incinerator on their property
instead. Do you still believe these commercial breeding
establishments spend their resources and time to rehabilitate these
dog-slaves when they are no longer capable of producing their
product? The fact remains they are killed and buried in trenches
or incinerated.
If, as fellow dog breeders, you do not feel a cold chill down your
spine just thinking of this, then I have spent the entirety of my life
around the wrong sort of people. To me, the concept
of supporting our interests on the backs of these hapless puppies and
their unfortunate parents is immoral and unethical. And yet
people who have been dog breeders their whole lives will have you
believe this is a reasonable solution. Balderdash. I find
the concept of a church running a brothel to support its good works
more palatable than this position.
Let’s try a little harder, folks. The pet industry will see sales
of over $10 Billion in 2008. And yet no one in the fancy can
figure out an ethical way to support the dog fancy that doesn’t require
the sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of dogs? The AKC is
sitting on a veritable goldmine of information – it has the very
makings of an extraordinary Internet business. Can you imagine
the possibilities for information if a subscription based, self-service
reporting system were established – something far more creative than
the current by-the-drink offerings currently there. An ability to
research breed standards over the years or historical
registration statistics; to create reports on judges on what dogs they
had in the ring and what dogs they put up over the last 5 years per
breed; or find out how many champions you’ve bred. They could
partner with some of the professional photographers to who have decades
of valuable photographs that we would all like to peruse. What
about online library services to allow all of us to access those rare
breed books? The possibilities for content are endless.
What about topical articles or videos to help pet owners? This
mine of data could be the centerpiece of a portal that provides
advertising to capture some of that $10 Billion dollars in
revenues. I rather think a good sized dent could be made in
the income delta the good people at the AKC now think has to be filled
with puppy mill registrations.
I implore this fancy to pull up its socks and stop supporting a revenue
model from the 1950’s. I realize there are arguments that puppy
mills will always exist, that the AKC oversight may provide better
inspections but I feel focusing on building an AKC brand that means
“quality” and means “we care about dogs” is a more defensible long-term
view. We have many talented, connected, gifted members – all of
whom should feel compelled to help the American Kennel Club work
through this transition period. Put your brains to work to help
answer this challenge. And let whatever path we end up taking not
be paved with the unfortunate lives of commercially bred puppies.
|
|
Copyright
©
Pluperfect Kennels & Cattery - 2008 |
|
|